The recent calls for an inquiry into Victoria's Big Build project have sparked a heated debate, with prominent figures in public policy and governance advocating for a thorough investigation. This article delves into the reasons behind these calls and explores the implications for Victoria's political landscape.
The Case for Inquiry
Dr. David Hayward, an esteemed public policy academic, has joined the chorus of voices demanding a "Queensland-style" commission of inquiry into the Big Build. His concern stems from the rolling revelations of union corruption, which he believes necessitates a deeper probe to restore public trust in the political system.
Hayward's perspective is particularly intriguing as he highlights the potential financial implications. He suggests that while the financial waste may not be as significant as initially perceived, the diversion of funds into the wrong hands is a more pressing issue. This raises questions about the integrity of the entire process and the need for a transparent investigation.
A Broader Public Need
The recent apology issued by Premier Jacinta Allan acknowledges the presence of criminals on construction sites, yet she has rejected the need for a royal commission, citing changing worksite culture. However, Dr. Hayward argues that the public's broader need for an inquiry goes beyond the premier's statement.
The redacted report by Queensland's Commission of Inquiry into the CFMEU, along with newspaper articles detailing alleged corruption, has created a demand for a Victorian probe. Geoffrey Watson SC's report paints a concerning picture of the CFMEU branch's descent into a "violent, hateful, and greedy" state, further fueling the need for an inquiry.
Restoring Public Trust
A key aspect of Dr. Hayward's argument is the impact of these revelations on public trust in mainstream democracy. With the rise of far-right parties across the West, there is a growing disillusionment with the political system, which many perceive as self-serving. Hayward believes that an inquiry is necessary to assure the public that their tax dollars are being spent responsibly and for the benefit of the community.
A Precedent for Inquiry
Dr. Hayward is not alone in his call for an inquiry. Former Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass and former IBAC Commissioner Robert Redlich have jointly advocated for a royal commission. Redlich describes the scandal as "unprecedented" and believes only a royal commission can root out all the causes and reasons for the failure of checks and balances.
Glass, too, emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation, given the "eye-watering" amounts of public money involved. She acknowledges the limitations of existing integrity agencies in dealing with the CFMEU allegations, hence the need for a royal commission, despite its expense and sometimes questionable track record.
A Political Dilemma
Premier Allan's stance is a delicate balance. While she has acknowledged the presence of criminals on construction sites, she has not committed to a royal commission, instead suggesting that evidence of criminal behavior should be handed directly to Victoria Police. This approach, however, has been met with skepticism, as it fails to address the broader concerns raised by public probity leaders.
Conclusion
The calls for an inquiry into Victoria's Big Build project are a reflection of the public's demand for transparency and accountability. As the state prepares for elections, the issue of public trust in the political system takes center stage. The debate surrounding the need for an inquiry highlights the complex interplay between governance, public perception, and the potential for reform. It remains to be seen whether the calls for an inquiry will be heeded, but the implications for Victoria's political landscape are undoubtedly significant.
